Facebook relationship status, DOMA and B2B Relationships

// <![CDATA[
// &lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
// &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;![CDATA[
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push([&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;_setAccount&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;, &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;UA-857684-6&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;]);
_gaq.push([&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;_trackPageview&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;]);
(function() {
var ga = document.createElement(&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;script&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;); ga.type = &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;text/javascript&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;; ga.async = true;
ga.src = (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39; == document.location.protocol ? &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;https://ssl&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39; : &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;http://www&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;) + &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;.google-analytics.com/ga.js&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;;
var s = document.getElementsByTagName(&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;script&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();
// ]]&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;amp;gt;
// ]]&amp;gt;
// ]]&gt;
// ]]>

With the latest "Facebook relationship status" categories and the Government decision today that it will no longer defend the Marriage Act or DOMA  (Defense of Marriage Act)  B2B marketing thought is truly at a cross-roads. Because ever since Dwyer,Schurr and Oh's 1987 article on relationship marketing, the customer funnel has been seen as  B2B partners proceeding through the following relationship phases viz. 1) Awareness  2) Exploration 3) Expansion 4) Commitment. The parallel logic  is based on the sociology of the traditional marriage starting with exploring possible mates,dating, engagement and marriage.CRM systems speak to this kind of linear view and to some extent SRM systems also take such a perspective.

Now with Facebook relationship status  categories like "Engaged", "Civil Union,"  "domestic partnership" or   the more complicated "it's complicated"  probably things will get  more involved in B2B relationship thinking as well. It's early days for marketing thought to classify customers into the Facebook categories given that we don't know exactly how you would map individual Facebook relationship categories to the inter-organizational relationships space. So  a whole lot of work is ahead for marketing thinkers.

Call it the "Facebook" effect or the impact of the younger millenial Y generation who seem to be much more tolerant of ambiguity in relationships  than older baby boomers or the more cynical Gen X. As Gen Y age and hold more important organizational positions, their world view will probably shape the B2B relationship field both in theory and practice. Contact StratoServe.

%d bloggers like this: